David Vance SubstackRead More
Just when you think that you have heard it all, along comes this! It’s a jaw-dropping display of policing overreach. A 23-year-old single father was arrested for shouting “We love bacon” during a protest against a proposed mosque in the Lake District.
Yes, he said the “B” word! What a monster.
And why exactly was he arrested, you may ask? Well, the charge was violating Section 5 of the Public Order Act 1986 for “threatening or abusive” words. The police deemed his humorous chant—referencing a British breakfast staple—as “racially abusive” because it was said near a PROPOSED Muslim religious site, where pork is forbidden. Please remember it is not an actual mosque – just one under construction.
So we have bacon exclusion areas now in the UK! Let that sink in.
This arrest exposes a chilling trend in UK policing and this has been evident since last July: it’s all about prioritising hurt feelings over free speech. It is the era of Starmer.
The incident unfolded during a heated protest, when tensions were high. The young man, handcuffed and hauled to a police van, insisted that he was merely expressing his love for bacon, not targeting anyone’s faith. Yet, the officer’s snap judgment labeled it a racial slur, conflating bacon with bigotry. This sets a dangerous precedent!
Let’s be clear. The UK has no blasphemy laws, yet, and religion isn’t a race. To criminalise a cheeky remark about bacon as racially abusive stretches the law to breaking point. It also undermines the very public order it’s meant to protect.
It also exposes bizarre policing priorities. Home Office data shows that in 2024, only 6% of reported thefts led to charges, yet here we are, with officers policing puns. This isn’t law enforcement; it’s performative pandering to Islam.
The arrest also raises questions about the state of free speech in the UK. Section 5 of the Public Order Act is notoriously vague, granting police sweeping powers to decide what’s “abusive.” Our country once took pride in allowing robust free expression, now it arrests someone for a bacon-related comment. The man concerned now faces potential court action, a stain on his record, and the stress of legal battles—all for a comment that, at worst, was tasteless. (unlike bacon, which is tasty). By equating a pro bacon chant to racial abuse, police risk alienating the majority community which see such actions as punitive!
If saying “I love bacon” lands you in handcuffs, what’s next—arrests for pork sausages in muslims zones?
