President Biden has indicted his Political Opponent. No crime has been committed by the former President, yet today we stand here with a sitting President acting no different than a Communist President in Russia, China, Cuba, Venezuela, or any other Tyrannical Government that infest our world.
President Biden has made the U.S. just another Bananas Republic.
The Washington Post was leaked what the charges will be.
The actual indictment against Trump has not yet been disclosed. But people familiar with the matter, speaking on the condition of anonymity to describe a still-sealed case, said a seven-count indictment has been filed in federal court naming the former president as a criminal defendant. The charges include illegal retention of government secrets, obstruction of justice and conspiracy, the people said.
We will have to wait for the reality of the actual indictment, but WaPo and the NYTs is where the Special Prosecutor leaks to on a regular basis to prime the spin about to come through the news pipes. So that is probably pretty accurate without any real details.
This case presents so many different questions in just exactly how to handle in Court. 1) Who has Jurisdiction? They are going to indict him in Federal Court in Miami. The Prosecutor is in D.C.. 2) A former President has never been indicted before. Is he going to be tried before a Local Judge, a State Court, a State Federal Court, a Federal Circuit Court, or should this be held before Congress with the Supreme Court presiding over it?
Donald Trump is not a Civilian, he is a former President, being accused of violating Presidential Procedures. Procedure that are not even written under any Criminal Statute. This is all over Presidential Records. The Presidential Records Act is NOT a Criminal Act. Every charge is being based on Trump committing criminal offenses of a Law that have no criminal weight.
The case against former President Bill Clinton keeping classified documents in his sock drawer after he was out of office. That case created Legal Precedent that should have prevented the Attorney General from ever appointing a Special Prosecutor, let alone raiding Mar A Lago. President Biden however doesn’t care about the Law, he only cares about arresting his political opponent.
When it comes to the National Archives, history has a funny way of repeating itself. And legal experts say a decade-old case over audio tapes that Bill Clinton once kept in his sock drawer may have significant impact over the FBI search of Melania Trump’s closet and Donald Trump’s personal office.
The case in question is titled Judicial Watch v. National Archives and Records Administration and it involved an effort by the conservative watchdog to compel the Archives to forcibly seize hours of audio recordings that Clinton made during his presidency with historian Taylor Branch.
For pop culture, the case is most memorable for the revelation that the 42nd president for a time stored the audio tapes in his sock drawer at the White House. The tapes became the focal point of a 2009 book that Branch wrote.
U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson in Washington D.C. ultimately rejected Judicial Watch’s suit by concluding there was no provision in the Presidential Records Act to force the National Archives to seize records from a former president.
But Jackson’s ruling — along with the Justice Department’s arguments that preceded it — made some other sweeping declarations that have more direct relevance to the FBI’s decision to seize handwritten notes and files Trump took with him to Mar-a-Lago. The most relevant is that a president’s discretion on what are personal vs. official records is far-reaching and solely his, as is his ability to declassify or destroy records at will.
The unprecedented actions of the Biden Administration are not just a threat to our Democratic Republic they completely destroy the integrity and Rule of Law in the United States.
Added for your education and enjoyment The Great One Mark Levin who sums up the ridiculousness of this better than anyone.
Visits: 55
