David Vance SubstackRead More
Well then, I have been talking about this issue on Substack in recent days and it took another ominous turn yesterday when that rancid mouthpiece of the British establishment “The Times” reported…
“…that the UK is preparing to send up to 10,000 troops to Ukraine under a long-term peacekeeping mission, with no clear exit strategy. According to sources in London, the British military contingent will remain for years, tasked with “maintaining the peace agreement” and “containing Russia.”
What the heck does that mean? Starmer cannot protect our British border yet his 10,000 men will somehow contain the 830, 000 strong Russian army! What on earth was he drinking? Can I have some too?
British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has reportedly secured the backing of several countries for this plan, raising serious questions about the true nature of this “peacekeeping” force.
Peacekeeping, or occupation?
It’s really obvious that *any* peacekeeping force could only operate in the Ukraine territory with the explicit agreement of both sides to the conflict -Russia and Ukraine. Russia has ruled out NATO aligned countries having any military presence in Ukraine. So why does Starmer continue with this military fantasy?
Some people have suggested that perhaps sending thousands of young British man to Ukrainian may create a void that young migrant man living in the UK illegally could fill? Is that possible?
However I look at it, the UK-EU political cabal are heading for conflict with Russia and the USA. Von de Leyen and Starmer are loving this reboot so they can cosplay at being military planners but sooner rather than later reality is going to intrude. It won’t end well!
If you enjoy all the content I put out here, can I ask you to consider to becoming a PAID subscriber, it’s a £5 a month, you can cancel if you don’t enjoy it but I know you will. I want to thank the kind people who already do this, without your help this becomes impossible. Thank you in anticipation.
Views: 2
