The Peril of Compliance.

Three years on from the launch of the Covid Plandemic, a lot of us still wonder HOW it can be that so many of our friends, family and associates complied with that which the Authorities requested of them. These were the people who stayed at home, who wore the masks, who took the jabs. These are people who put the Ukraine flag in their social media profiles. These are the people who were excited at receiving the Government’s emergency response on their phones a few weeks back. We all know them, they are legion.

However, if you are familiar with the seminal work of Yale University Psychologist Stanley Milgram, as those behind the UK Government’s NUDGE units would have been, this was all to be expected. Let’s just recap what Milgram discovered and then see how that is driving much of that which we have experienced.

He started experimenting in the early 1960’s and the purpose of his work was to try and understand how people complied with instructions from authority figures. How far would they go? Would they resist and if so, how many would resist? The results of his work are neatly summed up by Milgram as follows.

“The legal and philosophic aspects obedience is of enormous importance, but they say extraordinarily little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects’ [participants’] strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects’ [participants’] ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation. Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to conduct actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.”

This is the profound insight. Most people will happily do whatever they are asked to do, regardless of the pain this inflicts on their fellow human beings. The appeal of authority is overwhelmingly alluring to them, and they will follow whatever orders asked of them.

Another crucial insight here is found in this paragraph.

“What “people cannot be counted on is to realise that a seemingly benevolent authority is in fact malevolent, even when they are faced with overwhelming evidence which suggests that this authority is indeed malevolent. Hence, the underlying cause for the subjects’ striking conduct could well be conceptual, and not the alleged ‘capacity of man to abandon his humanity … as he merges his unique personality into larger institutional structures.”

Ring any bells? Yes, a minority of us saw through scams like Covid from the start and we rejected the appeal of authority. But the majority still do not see that something which seems benevolent can be very malevolent and capable of causing great harm. These would include those now on their 6th Covid jab, still wearing masks, or those donating to Ukraine.

Government psychologists fully understand this and in effect have weaponised the insight to enslave a majority of the population to Big Pharma toxins. The UK leads the world in this kind of manipulative psychological weaponization and has exported it to many other countries who successfully rolled it out during Covid times. It’s all too easy to attack China for how it controls its people, but are we really able to judge?

The merging of psychology and politics is toxic. It elevates the concept of control to a whole new level. It is said that around 80% of people will meekly submit to Authority and they can also become incredibly angry at the smaller number of dissidents. This is the world in which we live and it’s important that us refuseniks recognise Milgram’s learnings. Yes, I know that other scientists have disputed some of his work and how he conducted the research, but I ask you, dear reader, to reflect on the numbers of humanity that you saw going along with every aspect of what the Government asked during these past few years. It seems to me that Milgram did discover that Government can successfully manipulate a vast majority to go along with whatever it wants, and at whatever price!

Views: 170