David Vance SubstackRead More
The transgender movement, heralded as a liberating crusade for self-expression and justice in the 21st century, has entrenched itself in modern culture with an allure that masks very deep and sinister flaws. Beneath the rhetoric lies a project that is fundamentally misguided—rooted in a rejection of reality—and, in its more extreme tendencies, utterly demonic in its subversion of order, truth, and human well-being.
Central to its core misdirection is the assertion that gender is an infinitely malleable construct, divorced from the material fact of biological sex. This notion dismisses the body—its chromosomes, hormones, and reproductive systems—as incidental to identity, elevating subjective perception to an unassailable throne. Such a stance presupposes a radical dualism, where the self exists in opposition to its own flesh, a view that echoes dark ancient heresies more than it reflects reason. Human identity is not a blank slate to be rewritten. To deny this is to chase a chimera, mistaking fantasy for liberation.
The movement’s impact on our western societies amplifies this error. By insisting that gender self-identification overrides observable reality, it destabilises the framework that underpins collective life. Language, once a tool of shared understanding, becomes a battleground—pronouns weaponised, dissenters vilified. Institutions like sports, prisons, and shelters, built on the recognition of sexual dimorphism, are forced into contortions that defy fairness and safety.
This is not advancement but regression—a disintegration of coherence into a morass of competing claims, where the loudest voice prevails. The promise of inclusion rings hollow when it demands exclusion of reason itself.
Ethically, the movement’s zeal crosses into troubling territory, particularly with its approach to youth. The rush to affirm gender dysphoria in children with medical interventions—puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, surgeries—betrays a reckless disregard for evidence and consequence. Research highlights risks: infertility, cardiovascular strain, and a notable subset of de-transitioners grappling with irreversible loss. Yet questioning this orthodoxy is branded as hate, stifling debate in favor of ideology. To subject the vulnerable to experimental treatments under the banner of compassion is a moral inversion—a sacrifice of prudence to dogma that borders on the sinister. This inversion has a distinctly sulphuric fragrance to it.
The demonic charge emerges from the movement’s pattern of upending the good. It casts nature as oppressive, truth as subjective, and skepticism as malice, inverting the principles that sustain human thriving. The ultimate Faustian bargain, it offers empowerment but delivers fragmentation—individuals alienated from their bodies, communities from consensus. Its fervour, cloaked in self righteousness, leads followers astray and onto the rocks but all under the guise of salvation.
Compassion for those wrestling with gender distress is not in dispute; they deserve support rooted in reality, not foolish ideology. But the transgender movement, in its current form, misguides by promising transcendence through denial—of biology, of limits, of truth itself. Its demonic tint lies in this hubris: a rebellion against the given, with a cost yet to be fully reckoned. It is a rejection of God and the embrace of Satan. People deserve to be rescued from its pernicious grasp!
In the eternal battle between Good and Evil, the trans cult stands with the Dark One.
If you enjoy all the content I put out here, can I ask you to consider to becoming a PAID subscriber, it’s a £5 a month, you can cancel if you don’t enjoy it but I know you will. I want to thank the kind people who already do this, without your help this becomes impossible. Thank you in anticipation.
Views: 0
