David Vance SubstackRead More
Do you remember back during 2020 when we were told that IF we accepted the introduction of a Digital ID system, that would help fight an alleged respiratory illness called Covid? Yeah, it sounded as ridiculous then as it does now t and I for one would never have accepted it. Some of us railed against it back then and said this was a WEF plot to gain complete control over our daily lives. In essence it mirrored what the CCP was doing to its people where their every move was tracked and assessed as to whether it was a threat to the State. We were dismissed as “conspiracy theorists” But we were absolutely correct! This brings us to 20205.
Sir Keir Starmer is reportedly considering the introduction of digital ID cards primarily “to address illegal immigration, enhance border security, and improve public service efficiency”
What? These cross channel migrants all ditch any ID they may possess in the middle of the English Channel so they don’t have ANY ID when they are ferried here. Yet Starmer is trying to claim that if WE all have Digital ID that will somehow demotivate them from coming here!!! Is there anyone out there who thinks this is in anyway plausible? It’s an even more insane justification than in 2020.
In essence, the PM wants us to be all tracked whilst migrants arrive untracked!
So there is absolutely NO possible benefit to the migration issue and it will in no way “enhance border security”! As for the idea that it will “improve public service efficiency”, that is also ludicrous. The bloated public sector will only become even more overbearing and officious.
Most of us possess a Passport and a Driving license. That is all the ID we need.
Let’s remember that Tony Blair has been relentlessly pushing this idea of Digital ID. Here is a quote from the Tony Blair Institute;
“Digital-ID systems improve governance, facilitate greater inclusion, fuel economic growth and help governments achieve their core goals. Far from enabling greater surveillance, digital IDs can actually make information more secure. Beyond their public-sector benefits, they also allow citizens to interact more safely and smoothly with private-sector institutions. They are a critical component of a reimagined state fit for the 21st century.”
All unadulterated Davos drivel.
It seems to me that Starmer has far too many other problems to implement this but we should be very wary that his regime may at least try. Those behind this know that if it was implemented they would have complete control over us all. Our freedoms would vanish and the very idea of of criticising the regime would carry impossible risks.
If we enjoy my work please consider supporting me by becoming a PAID subscriber. It’s a £5 a month and it gets you access to all my content and HELPS keep me going.
