Blue Suits at the Vatican!

ByDavid Vance

​ 

​  David Vance SubstackRead More

​

The media’s latest circus act—smearing Donald Trump over his alleged “disrespect” at Pope Francis’ funeral —is a masterclass in deception, driven by their rabid anti-Trump agenda. They pounced on his choice of a blue suit, chewing gum, and phone use during the Vatican service, screaming “disrespect” while ignoring the broader context and their own hypocrisy.

Let’s shred their narrative with the facts they conveniently buried.

First, the suit. The media wailed that Trump’s blue ensemble defied the Vatican’s black dress code, branding him a classless oaf.

Note the cropped image, the FULL image is at the top of this article so you can see what they did. They barely whispered that Joe Biden and Prince William also wore blue suits, with Biden even snapping selfies during the event—a far cry from solemnity. Why the double standard? Because Trump triggers them. The media’s selective lens isn’t journalism—it’s propaganda.]

Oh, and there was ANOTHER attendee who chose not to wear any suit and yet the media had nothing to say about him!

Then there’s the gum-chewing and phone fiasco. Outlets like The Mirror screeched that Trump chewing gum and glancing at his phone made him a “total disgrace.” Trump is a world leader, juggling global crises while the media obsesses over his gum use like it’s a war crime. And the phone? I would think that he has constant information flow. The media didn’t care that Trump was the first sitting U.S. president since George W. Bush to attend a papal funeral, showing respect despite past tensions with Francis over immigration and climate issues. No, they’d rather spin a narrative of “Orange Man Bad.”

The media’s motive is obvious: they loathe Trump’s America-first stance, which clashes with their globalist dogma. They’ve been after him since day one, and the funeral was just another chance to try and twist the knife. They ignored his front-row seat—a Vatican honour—his meeting with Zelensky and his ordering flags at half-staff, all gestures of respect.

Instead, they crafted a caricature of a boorish Trump to rile up their audience.

This isn’t about disrespect; it’s about control. The media wants to dictate how Trump should act, dress, and grieve, all while glossing over their own bias. Trump doesn’t play their game—he never has. And that’s why they’ll keep lying. They’re not journalists; they’re activists with keyboards.

****I put out at least three articles a day. If you enjoy all this can I ask you to consider to becoming a PAID subscriber, it’s only £5 a month, you can cancel if you don’t enjoy it but I know you will. I want to thank the kind people who already do this, without your help this becomes impossible. Thank you in anticipation of your support****

David Vance Substack is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.

 

 

Similar Posts

  • Heading for the Dark Ages.

    ByDavid Vance

    There was a pretty momentous decision made by the UK Supreme Court yesterday in respect of the UK’s future ability to heat and power itself. Naturally all the eco-zealots were delighted at this decision; The Supreme Court has ruled a local council should have considered the full climate impact of burning oil from new wells – a landmark decision which could put future UK oil and gas projects in question. Under planning law the assumption has always been that only the impacts from constructing the wells and not the use of the final oil products should be considered. The case brought against Surrey County Council by Sarah Finch, on behalf of campaigners could threaten new UK fossil fuels projects.

     

  • SOS – Save our Starmer!

    By

    Did anybody else think that Rishi Sunak’s speech outside Downing Street last Friday night was a little strange? Me too. But I think we need to decipher it to understand what is really going on! As always with Rishi, it seems to be style over substance. Nothing he said made any real sense beyond some vague notion of “fighting” far-left and far-right extremism. Now given that there is no “far right” extremism in the UK, perhaps we can conclude that Rishi REALLY meant “Islamic” terrorism but lacked the balls to say it? Yes? So instead he dressed it up with fake balance but it was the

     

  • Is the Archbishop of Canterbury a Christian?

    By

    I think it’s pretty clear that Justin Welby, the current Archbishop of Canterbury, is the very antithesis of being a Christian. In that regard, he isn’t the first apostate to hold that position. In fact, it’s hard for me to remember any Archbishop of Canterbury in my lifetime who was clearly a committed Christian. Given that this is the most senior position in the Established Church it is therefore hardly a big surprise that Church attendances are dwindling, churches are closing and every form of modern sin in condoned within the church.