David Vance SubstackRead More
Just imagine. You are sitting on a train. You are relaxed, looking forward to arriving at your destination. And then the screaming starts and the blood starts pouring. That’s what happened on the train from Doncaster to London Kings Cross.
We know that the attacker boarded the train at Peterborough railway station and began stabbing passengers indiscriminately shortly after the train departed at 7.30pm.The incident lasted about 10 to 15 minutes before the train was diverted to Huntingdon station, where armed police arrested two men, one of whom was released without charge.
11 people were stabbed by the knifeman. Several of his victims remain in intensive care in critical condition. The train staff member who confronted the attacker is in a life-threatening state. Other injured passengers have been treated and stabilised, with some being discharged as their conditions improved.
So far, so clear, but then things started to go off the rails as the British State swung into the usual routine.
The British Transport Police had declared the situation a major incident and launched “Operation Plato” This meant it was seen as a marauding terror attack but THEN downgraded when no “terrorist connections” were found. Counter Terrorism Policing supported the investigation initially, but police have confirmed there is no evidence linking it to terrorism.
Get that? A mass stabbing – which could have been mass murder – is not defined as terrorism
So what is it – recreational knifing?
Here’s how terrorism is defined, legally.
The Terrorism Act 2000 says it is actions or threats involving serious violence against people, serious damage to property, endangering life (other than the perpetrator’s), creating serious risks to public health or safety, or seriously disrupting electronic systems….
Got that? I bet you are thinking that based on that this IS terrorism. But here comes the clincher…
..These acts must be carried out to influence the government or an international governmental organization or to intimidate the public, and must be aimed at advancing a political, religious, racial, or ideological cause.
See what they do? It might be terroristic in nature but it isn’t legally terrorism
Next comes the next fix.
The suspect in custody is a 32-year-old British man, with another person previously detained released without charges.
Get that? Understand the programming here….
He’s British, British as can be. It’s just he likes to stab people. But he’s British. As British as you, or me.
Now we know that he is also a black guy as can be seen in this video.
But are there other clues?
Well, he got on the train at Peterborough. This is interesting for at least two reasons.
-
Peterborough has a large MUSLIM population of over 12%, twice that of the average English town.
-
Peterborough has a notably higher percentage of Black residents, as some surrounding areas report lower proportions.
The Islam motive has neither been confirmed or denied by the Police. Some reports had initially said he shouted “Allah akhbar” as he stabbed but these appear to be false. So what did he say? Did he stab in silence? What WAS his motive?
I fear that the next card to be played is “Metal Illness” and at that point this story will vanish.
The chilling reality is that the British State has a clear agenda to ensure that these acts are seen as NOT being terror and NOT being driven by Islam. Most reasonable people will refute that this was not terrorism and as for the motive, let’s wait and see.
